Ah, much of a hubbub Friday on the
twitters,
boards and
blogs about Ladies-only tournaments.
Because I like to weigh in on topics every now and then..
-Personally, I think any xxxx-only event (Ladies, Seniors, Gingers, et.al) based on identity you can't control is stupid.
I'm half-Okinawan.
Can I get a BananaKid tournament for all the other mulatto halfblood
gaijin and exclude all the purebred whiteys and Japs?
ROR!
The only restrictions on registering for a tournament should be this:
1) Do you have the buy-in?
2) Is there an available seat?
3) Is this a ToC-style tournament where it's a series championship with qualifying winners? (basically, a shootout in concept)
Otherwise, all invitationals/xxx-only events suck a fatty, because by their very nature, they're exclusionary - and poker is supposed to be about ANYONE being able to play if there's a seat open and they have the $$$.
-That being said, I can understand the promotional value in a WSOP Ladies Event - although I'm not so sure it doesn't ghettoize women into playing women-only tournaments more than it entices them to step forward and play open events. (Bonus for the WSOP for keeping an identical structure with the other 1K donkaments - most other Ladies tourneys have accelerated structures/smaller starting stacks to get them over with quicker, but at least players are getting equal value here.)
But it's not worth my time to sit there and rail against it for more than this post, or to do anything as drastic as enter and play in a Ladies event, whether dressed normally or in drag...
-But for those
men that choose to enter and play - well, that's just how it goes. If you're trying to make a logical point/protest, no one will get it over the noise and hubbub of controversy. It's hard to piss uphill
and upwind without blowback....
If it's a stunt, or a lark, or some kind of mean insult - well whatever dude, your life.
FTrain's Lebowski quote is true...
Walter Sobchak: Am I wrong?
The Dude: No you're not wrong.
Walter Sobchak: Am I wrong?
The Dude: You're not wrong Walter. You're just an asshole.
Punishment/banning the villains is even dumber and just makes the whole situation even more of a clusterfuck.
Societal disapproval (the tsktsk factor) is far more effective a deterrent than anything a TD can do to nip this in the bud.
-Unscientific survey: asked the wifey if she would play in a Ladies event over an open event.
Photojenn: "No, I really don't want to sit at a table with all women."
She understands a very true fact. Nine women at a table can be far more dangerous and annoying than one woman and eight men.
Now when I play live or go to a bar poker tournament - I'd much rather play with women at the table for a number of reasons...
-table is much looser, more talkative, and overall more friendly.
-dopey men tend to stay in line more and behave better.
-and yeah, in general, women tend to play more predictably, I'm not going to lie.
But to be honest, I find playing a strong woman player a wonderful challenge. Sure I might get pwned, but not like that doesn't happen all the time...
In a nutshell, there's NOTHING about poker that's truly sex-dependent.
If women play badly as a rule, that's an experience and societal issue, not an X chromosome problem.
So why bother to segregate based on something that's as relevant as ethnicity or sexual preference?
/end soapbox
Other news.
-Geez,
jjok has the best freaking attitude ever about all of
this. Apparently still heading to the ME too...
-Play the
OhCaptain charity tourney next Wednesday. I'm deadstacking since it's my third wedding anniversary, so enjoy me blinds...
-I picked up a satty win into the Stars big 200-seat guarantee tournament on the 20th, so I've managed to get almost T$1800 of WSOP ME entries for about $150 in real dollars. I'm going to let it rip this Sunday and next and see what happens...